Transcriptomic Analysis in Response to Combined Stress by UV-B
Radiation and Cold in Belle Pepper (Capsicum
annuum)
Brandon
Estefano Morales-Merida1,2, Claudia Villicaña3, Adriana
Leticia Perales-Torres2, Humberto Martínez-Montoya2,
Octelina Castillo-Ruiz2, Rubén León-Chan4, Luis Alberto
Lighbourn-Rojas4, J Basilio Heredia1 and Josefina
León-Félix1*
1Centro
de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo. Carretera a Eldorado Km
5.5, Campoel Diez. C.P. 80110, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México
2Unidad
Académica Multidisciplinaria Reynosa-Aztlán, Universidad
Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, México
3CONACYT-Centro
de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo. Carretera a Eldorado Km
5.5, Campo el Diez, C.P. 80110. Culiacán, Sinaloa, México
4Laboratorio
de Genética, Instituto de Investigación Lightbourn, A. C., Cd. Jiménez, Chihuahua, 33981,
México
*For correspondence:
ljosefina@ciad.mx
Received 18 August 2020;
Accepted 04 January 2021; Published 16 April 2021
Abstract
The bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is classified as a Solanaceae of economic importance with
high nutritional value. However, its production is limited by abiotic factors
such as low temperature and UV-B radiation, which can cause extensive damage to
crops. Plants may respond to environmental stressors by inducing several
morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes. RNA-seq
technique is widely applied to study the global gene expression in numerous
processes related to plant biology, including responses induced by abiotic
stress, providing relevant information about the genes and the pathways that
participate in stress-induced responses. In this study, we analyzed the
differential gene expression in response to combined stress of UV-B radiation and cold after
exposure at 1, 3 and 25 h in stems from C.
annuum plants, to gain deeper insights about the temporal dynamic of genes
and pathways modulated by these factors. We found that 281, 280 and 326 genes
were differentially expressed at 1, 3 and 25 h, respectively. Functional
annotation revealed that most of genes were associated with hydrolase activity,
stress response, stimulus response, carbohydrate metabolic process, and
biosynthetic process. Based on KEGG pathway analysis, we found that circadian
rhythm-plant, flavonoids biosynthesis and MAPK signaling pathway were
statistically significant in almost all the sampling times. In conclusion, we found that several
genes related to defense against pathogens and cell wall expansion were
down-regulated, meanwhile the up-regulated genes were related to chloroplast
protection, hormone and flavonoids biosynthesis, and compound transport. © 2021
Friends Science Publishers
Keywords:
Abiotic stress; Capsicum stems; Cold; UV-B; Transcriptomics
Introduction
Bell
pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an
annual and herbaceous plant that belongs to the family Solanaceae such
as tomato and potatoes, and is one of the most economically important crops in
the world. In 2017, bell pepper was considered the third vegetable with the
highest production worldwide, with an estimated contribution of 36 million
tons. Since Capsicum grows in tropical and even temperate regions,
diverse abiotic stresses, such as salinity, temperature, drought, flood, UV
radiation and heavy metals, may affect its growth, causing 50 to 70% yield
losses worldwide (Chugh et al. 2018).
In bell pepper, the
temperature greatly affects its production, in which the optimal temperature
ranges from 21 to 27ºC, while lower temperatures affect its growth and
reproduction (Pressman et al. 2006).
Several studies have shown that cold induces numerous morphological,
biochemical and molecular changes in C.
annuum. Mercado et al. (1997)
observed a decrease in height, number of leaves and leaf area, while the
content of carbohydrates and soluble proteins were increased. In leaves,
exposure to 8ºC increases the levels of antioxidant compounds as ascorbate,
glutathione and NADPH-generating dehydrogenases (Airaki et al. 2012). Likewise, Guo et
al. (2012) showed that cold (10/6°C) increased H2O2
and malondialdehyde, indicating cell membrane damage, which consequently triggers
an increase of enzymatic activity of glutathione reductase, dehydroascorbate
reductase, monoDHAR, guaiacol peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase. In pepper
seedlings, cold treatment increased the accumulation of total soluble proteins,
proline and phenolic compounds in stems, while decreased the content of
chlorophyll (Koç et al. 2010).
Molecularly, several transcription factors are induced upon exposure to cold
stress, including EREBP (CaEREBP-C1 to C4), WRKY (CaWRKY1), bZIP (CaBZ1) (Hwang
et al. 2005), NAM, ATAF1/ 2, CUC2
(Hou et al. 2020) and ERF/AP2-type
(CaPF1) (Yi et al. 2004), in which
heterologous overexpression of CaPF1 increased tolerance against freezing and
resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis (Yi et al. 2004), while
overexpression of CaNAC064 increased tolerance to cold stress (Hou et al.
2020).
On the other hand,
ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B), corresponding to the high energy (280–320 nm)
of daylight, has a great impact on plants. In bell pepper leaves, UV-B was
found to increase proline, quercetin, rutin and anthocyanin, while the content
of chlorophylls and carotenoids were reduced (Mahdavian et al. 2008). Moreover, Rodríguez-Calzada et al. (2019) reported an increased expression of the phenylalanine
ammonia lyase (PAL) and chalcone synthase (CHS) genes, related to the
accumulation of chlorogenic acid, luteolin 8-C-hexoside in response to UV-B.
Another study, Lai et al. (2011) identified 183 differential
expression genes, related to carbohydrate metabolic process, protein
modification process, catabolic process and cellular homeostasis.
In nature, the
combination of two or more stresses is common, and plant responses induced by
combined stressors are largely controlled by cross-talk between different
sensors and signal transduction pathways, which can activate or inhibit each
other (Mittler and Blumwald 2010; Atkinson and Urwin 2012; Suzuki et al. 2014). Despite the advances in
understanding the molecular regulation in UV-B or cold stress, a few studies
have been conducted to assess the combined effect of these abiotic factors in
plant stress responses. In this
regard, León-Chan et al. (2017)
showed that UV-B and cold induced the degradation of chlorophyll and
accumulation of carotenoids, chlorogenic acid, apigenin and luteolin glucosides
in comparison to each abiotic stress. Further, transcriptional analysis showed
the upregulation of flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H) gene indicating the activation of flavonoid biosynthetic
pathway in response to UV-B and cold in bell pepper stems, while flavonoid-3',
5'-hydroxylase (F3´5´H),
dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) and
anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) were
more strongly induced separately in UV-B or cold treatments (León-Chan et al. 2020). Nonetheless, changes in
global gene expression patterns in response to combined UV-B and cold is
relatively unknown. In an attempt to gain deeper insights about the temporal
dynamic of genes and pathways modulated by these combined stressors, we
analyzed transcriptional changes using the RNA-seq analysis to provide relevant
information about the genes and the pathways that participate in stress-induced
responses. Hence, the aim of this study was to analyze the transcriptomic
profile of C. annuum stems in
response to combined UV-B radiation and cold stress at different times, to
provide new insights about the specific genes and pathways involved at early,
intermediate and late plant responses.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and growth
conditions: Commercial bell pepper seeds Canon cv. (Zeraim Gedera Syngenta;
Israel) were germinated and maintained as previously described (León-Chan et al. 2017). Twenty-eight days after
sowing (DAS), bell pepper plants were put into a plant growth chamber
(GC-300TLH, JEIO TECH; South Korea) at control conditions, which consisted of a
12 h photoperiod (from 6:00 to 18:00 h) of PAR radiation (972 μmolm-2 s-1),
temperature of 25/20°C (day/night) and relative humidity of 65% for three days.
For treatment of UV-B and cold, temperature was adjusted at 15/10°C the
previous night (day 30 at 18:00 h) and Capsicum
plants were irradiated with PAR for 6 h (from 06:00 to 10:00 and 16:00 to 18:00
h) and UV-B irradiation (72 kJ·m2) for 6 h (from 10:00 to 16:00 h),
and this was maintained until sampling (day 31 and 32). For sampling, stems
from 10 bell pepper plants were collected at 0, 1, 3 and 25 h after stress
exposure by duplicate, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.
Total RNA isolation
and library preparation: Treated and control plant stems were collected and
subjected to total RNA isolation. Stems were pulverized with liquid nitrogen
and total RNA was isolated from 50–100 mg of tissue with Trizol reagent
(Ambion, Life Technologies, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer ́s
instructions with the following modifications: for precipitation step, we
replaced 0.5 mL of isopropyl alcohol, with a mixture of 0.25 mL of isopropyl
alcohol and 0.25 mL of 7.5 M lithium
chloride; finally, RNA washes with 75% ethyl alcohol were
carried out twice. Genomic DNA was removed with Turbo DNA free kit (Invitrogen,
Life Technologies, U.S.A.). RNA concentration was determined using NanoDrop
2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.A.) and RNA integrity
was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA of acceptable purity and
integrity (A260/A280: ≥ 1.8; RIN ≥ 8) was used to prepare cDNA
libraries of 150 paired-end readings in the Illumina TruSeq library system. The
concentration of two libraries was determined by fluorometry at Qubit (Life
Technologies). Later, the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq-500
platform according to the sequencing service provider, National Laboratory of
Genomics for Biodiversity (LANGEBIO) Unit CINVESTAV-IPN; Irapuato, Guanajuato,
Mexico.
Data processing and DEG
identification: The quality of raw reads was visualized using FASTQC program,
and then trimmed using Trimmomatic with the following parameters: quality score
of 30 (SLIDINGWINDOW:4:30) and minimum reading length of 20 (MINLEN: 20).
Afterwards, the trimmed reads were aligned to the pepper reference genome
(Pepper Zunla 1 Ref_v1.0, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=txid4072[orgn])
using HiSAT2. Gene expression levels were calculated by counting the number of
mapped reads per annotated gene model using HTSeq-count, and raw read counts
were normalized for RPKM (Love et al.
2014). For downstream analyses, differentially expressed genes (DEG) were
determined using DESeq2 in R software (Anders and Huber 2010), where DEGs were
considered with ≧ 1.5-fold expression with respect to the control
and adjusted P value α ≦
0.05. The Volcano plots, Venn diagrams and Cluster analysis were realized using
pheatmap, EnhancedVolcano and VennDiagram package in R software (version
1.2.5001; http://www.r-project.org/).
Gene ontology and KEGG enrichment analysis:
The GO enrichment of DEGs was performed in UNIPROTKB (https://www.uniprot.org/uploadlists/)
and AgriGO (http://bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO/analysis.php)
web-based tool for GO analysis. GO terms were performed with FDR ≦ 0.05. We carried out the
statistical enrichment of the differential expression genes in Kyoto
Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (α ≦ 0.05).
Results
Data processing and DEG identification:
A total of 97,291,544 paired-end raw reads were obtained in this study. The
quality assessment using FastQC showed an average 24,663,149 reads with a
length of 150 pb and an average content of 51% GC, per sample. All raw reads
from samples had quality levels with a Phred value between 14 and 36. After filtering
with Trimmomatic, the samples were left with filtered reads with length > 20
and a Phred value ≥ 30 (Q30), preserving on average 39% of the total raw
reads (Table 1). Read alignments had a mapping rate of 35.34 to 50.87% of total
filtered reads.
For the combined
treatment of UV-B and cold at 1 h, 281 differentially expressed genes (DEG)
were identified, of which
154 were up-regulated and 127 down-regulated (Fig. 1A); for 3 h, 280 DEG, of
which 167 were up-regulated and 113 down-regulated (Fig. 1B); and for 25 h, 326
DEG, of which 138 were
up-regulated and 188 down-regulated (Fig. 1C).
The Venn diagrams
revealed that the gene expression profile differed significantly along the
three treatments, showing that 29, 54 and 32 genes were up-regulated
exclusively at 1, 3 and 25 h, respectively, and 66 genes were induced at all-time
points (Fig. 2A). For down-regulated genes 29, 28 and 90 were exclusively
observed at 1, 3 and 25 h after treatment exposure, in addition to 65 genes
observed at all times of sampling (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, the 66 up-regulated
genes present at all times, included genes such as APRR1, APRR5, chalcone
synthase-1B, chalcone synthase-2 and chalcone synthase-J related to photoperiod
and flavonoid synthesis; whereas the 65 down-regulated genes expressed at the
different times of sampling were involved in diterpenoid, sesquiterpenoid and
triterpenoid biosynthesis and defense against pathogens, such as beta-amyrin synthase, (-)-
Table 1: Statistics of raw reads filtering
Sequences |
Total
raw reads |
Total
filtered reads (Trimmomatic) |
Q30
(%) |
GC
(%) |
Ctrl
A |
22387045 |
8440660 |
38 |
51% |
Ctrl
B |
23517336 |
9468927 |
40 |
51% |
Treat
1A |
24488878 |
9073092 |
37 |
51% |
Treat
1B |
26898285 |
10541133 |
39 |
49% |
Treat
3A |
24884652 |
9742863 |
39 |
51% |
Treat
3B |
20673273 |
7516910 |
36 |
49% |
Treat
25A |
30987008 |
13585897 |
44 |
42% |
Treat
25B |
23468715 |
9219918 |
39 |
51% |
Ctrl A, Ctrl B: stem of control samples; Treat 1A, Treat 1B: stem exposed to 1 h; Treat 3A, Treat 3B: stem
exposed to 3 h; Treat 25A, Treat 25B: stem exposed to 25 h. Ctrl: control; Treat:
treatment; G-C: Guanine-cytosine
germacrene-D-synthase,
cytochrome P450-82C4, PYL12, flower-specific defensin and zingipain. Cluster
analysis revealed very different transcriptomic profiles underlying a marked
differential gene expression at each time of sampling, including genes involved
in plasma membranes, compound transport, chloroplast, cell wall, signaling and
transduction of cellular signals, ROS oxidation, hormones and activity against
pathogens (Fig. 3).
GO classification
analysis of DEGs: For the combined treatment of UV-B and cold after 1 h of
exposure, GO enrichment analysis showed that three categories for the cellular
component, two for molecular function and three for the biological process, of
which hydrolase activity (GO:0016787) and response to stress (GO:0006950) were
statistically significant with 25 and 15 genes, respectively. For 3 h
treatment, three categories were identified for the cellular component, two for
molecular function and 14 for biological processes; from these, four categories
were statistically significant: response to abiotic stimulus with 19 genes
(GO:0009628), response to stress with 14 genes (GO:0006950), carbohydrate
metabolic process with 8 genes (GO:0005975) and biosynthetic process with 18
genes (GO:0009058). For treatment at 25 h, two categories were identified for
the cellular component, two for molecular function and five for biological
process; from these, three categories were statistically significant: hydrolase
activity with 36 genes (GO:0016787), response to stress with 17 genes
(GO:0006950) and carbohydrate metabolic process with 18 genes (GO:0005975)
(Fig. 4).
The response to
stress (GO:0006950) category was significantly identified in all times, where
genes were related to hormone biosynthesis, ROS oxidation and defense against
pathogens, some genes are cytochrome P450 (98A2, CYP72A219 and CYP736A12),
catalase, peroxidase, pathogenesis-related STH-2, RPP13 disease resistant and
flower-specific defensin (Table 2). Genes grouped in hydrolase activity
(GO:0016787) were found at 1 h and
Table 2: Genes identified in the response to stress category
Gene ID |
Name |
1 h |
3 h |
25 h |
|||
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
||
107854492 |
catalase |
3.85 |
0.02 |
4.69 |
0.00 |
3.88 |
0.02 |
107856092 |
peroxidase 45-like |
2.05 |
0.03 |
1.34 |
0.36 |
2.18 |
0.02 |
107871732 |
cryptochrome DASH, chloroplastic/mitochondrial |
2.09 |
0.00 |
3.06 |
0.00 |
1.70 |
0.00 |
107844023 |
cytochrome P450 98A2-like |
1.10 |
0.01 |
1.51 |
0.00 |
1.38 |
0.00 |
107878596 |
cytochrome P450 CYP72A219-like |
1.54 |
0.00 |
2.11 |
0.00 |
1.03 |
0.08 |
107850965 |
cytochrome P450 CYP736A12-like |
2.09 |
0.00 |
1.64 |
0.00 |
2.20 |
0.00 |
107863949 |
linolenate hydroperoxide lyase, chloroplastic |
1.33 |
0.01 |
1.52 |
0.00 |
0.57 |
0.51 |
107877227 |
cytochrome P450 72A15-like |
-4.84 |
0.01 |
-5.76 |
0.02 |
-0.39 |
0.93 |
107863881 |
cytochrome P450 82C4-like |
-2.11 |
0.04 |
-3.19 |
0.00 |
-2.11 |
0.03 |
107870440 |
disease resistance protein RPP13-like |
-1.48 |
0.07 |
-1.26 |
0.20 |
-1.65 |
0.03 |
107864567 |
pathogenesis-related protein STH-2-like |
-1.50 |
0.00 |
-1.08 |
0.00 |
-0.95 |
0.01 |
107850294 |
kirola-like |
-0.69 |
0.31 |
-1.01 |
0.07 |
-2.66 |
0.00 |
107877005 |
flower-specific defensin-like |
-1.67 |
0.04 |
-2.08 |
0.01 |
-2.77 |
0.00 |
107863162 |
RNA polymerase
sigma factor sigE, chloroplastic/mitochondrial |
1.50 |
0.00 |
1.90 |
0.00 |
1.11 |
0.02 |
107875362 |
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CHIP |
1.10 |
0.01 |
1.52 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.05 |
107865651 |
ethylene-responsive proteinase inhibitor 1-like |
-1.25 |
0.55 |
-2.06 |
0.23 |
-2.52 |
0.05 |
107850595 |
dnaJ protein homolog |
-0.91 |
0.03 |
-0.74 |
0.15 |
-1.72 |
0.00 |
107843192 |
protein ROS1-like |
-1.09 |
0.03 |
-1.52 |
0.00 |
-0.99 |
0.06 |
107879996 |
Fanconi anemia group I protein |
0.76 |
0.56 |
0.88 |
0.52 |
1.55 |
0.04 |
107864208 |
phosphate transporter PHO1 |
1.72 |
0.00 |
1.51 |
0.01 |
1.53 |
0.01 |
107848500 |
bidirectional sugar transporter N3-like |
1.31 |
0.01 |
1.57 |
0.00 |
1.13 |
0.04 |
107845990 |
pyruvate decarboxylase 1 |
1.53 |
0.00 |
1.32 |
0.00 |
1.26 |
0.01 |
107859400 |
allantoinase |
1.75 |
0.00 |
1.33 |
0.04 |
0.87 |
0.28 |
LFC: log2 fold changes
Fig. 1: Volcano graph, genes
differentially expressed at 1 (A), 3
(B) and 25 h (C) in response to combined stress UV-B radiation and cold
25 h, corresponding
to carboxylesterase 8, vicianin, zingipain, endochitinase, ABC transporter (B,
C and G), acyl-thioesterase 1/2 and phospholipase D, which participates in defense
against pathogens, plasma membranes and transport of compounds (Table 3).
Besides, the carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0005975) related to changes in
the cell wall was important at 3 h and 25 h, finding genes such as
β-D-xylosidase 2, β-galactosidase, pectinesterase, inositol oxygenase
and endoglucanase (Table 4). Meanwhile, response to abiotic stimulus (GO:0009628)
and biosynthetic process (GO:0009058) were only found at 3 h; interestingly,
the genes identified in these two categories are related to photoreceptor
activity, protection of chloroplasts and flavonoid biosynthesis, some genes
were ultraviolet-B receptor UVR8, adagio 3, stress enhanced, dehydrin, sigma
factor, chalcone synthase J, chalcone synthase-1B and chalcone synthase-2
(Table 5 and 6).
Fig. 2: Venn diagrams showing the shared
differential number up-regulated (A)
and down-regulated genes (B) between
1, 3 and 25 h
Fig. 3: Cluster analysis of differential
genes at 1, 3 and 25 h after combined cold and UV-B treatment
KEGG analysis of
DEGs: Regarding the relevant role of UV-B and cold in the modulation of
metabolism revealed by GO enrichment, we decided to analyze DEG using KEGG
enrichment map. Our analysis showed that DEG belonging to the circadian
rhythm-plant and flavonoids biosynthesis were the most enriched among the 10
pathways identified to up-regulated genes at 1 h (Fig. 5A), while no pathway
was significant for the down-regulated genes (Fig. 5B). In addition, the
enriched pathways at 3 h of exposure to combined treatment primarily were
circadian rhythm-plant and flavonoids biosynthesis for the up-regulated genes,
both statistically significant (Fig. 6A), meanwhile for the down-
Table 3: Genes identified in the hydrolase activity category
Gene ID |
Name |
1 hour |
3 hours |
25 hours |
|||
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
||
107862340 |
ABC transporter
B family member 25-like |
1.55 |
0.00 |
1.38 |
0.01 |
1.56 |
0.00 |
107855690 |
ABC transporter
C family member 14 |
1.52 |
0.00 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
1.69 |
0.00 |
107878709 |
dynein light
chain 1, cytoplasmic |
2.42 |
0.01 |
2.28 |
0.01 |
1.99 |
0.03 |
107845681 |
myosin-2-like |
-1.54 |
0.01 |
-1.56 |
0.01 |
-1.03 |
0.13 |
107839653 |
phospholipase D
zeta 1-like |
2.25 |
0.01 |
1.05 |
0.58 |
2.40 |
0.01 |
107843045 |
lipid phosphate
phosphatase gamma, chloroplastic |
1.53 |
0.01 |
1.37 |
0.03 |
1.38 |
0.02 |
107839030 |
acyl-protein thioesterase 1 homolog 1-like |
1.63 |
0.03 |
1.79 |
0.02 |
2.03 |
0.00 |
107876040 |
acyl-protein thioesterase 2 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
1.83 |
0.00 |
1.46 |
0.00 |
107859400 |
allantoinase |
1.75 |
0.00 |
1.33 |
0.04 |
0.87 |
0.28 |
107859674 |
ATP-dependent
zinc metalloprotease FTSH 6, chloroplastic |
3.81 |
0.00 |
3.77 |
0.00 |
3.21 |
0.00 |
107851284 |
fumarylacetoacetase-like |
0.97 |
0.05 |
0.92 |
0.10 |
1.53 |
0.00 |
107869091 |
beta-amylase 3,
chloroplastic |
2.60 |
0.00 |
2.67 |
0.00 |
2.73 |
0.00 |
107878266 |
beta-amylase |
1.57 |
0.05 |
1.25 |
0.22 |
1.46 |
0.07 |
107862757 |
alpha-galactosidase-like |
-0.96 |
0.00 |
-0.79 |
0.04 |
-1.54 |
0.00 |
107867137 |
patatin-like protein 2 |
-1.84 |
0.00 |
-0.83 |
0.39 |
-1.20 |
0.07 |
107860321 |
PLP1; patatin-like protein 3 |
-1.80 |
0.13 |
-1.79 |
0.18 |
-2.26 |
0.02 |
107859333 |
phospholipase
A1-IIgamma-like |
N/A |
N/A |
-2.08 |
0.19 |
-2.48 |
0.03 |
107875477 |
ABC transporter
G family member 31 |
-1.62 |
0.04 |
-0.74 |
0.65 |
-1.38 |
0.10 |
107870765 |
ABC transporter
B family member 2-like |
-0.37 |
0.85 |
-0.37 |
0.89 |
-2.32 |
0.00 |
107871378 |
pleiotropic
drug resistance protein 2-like |
-1.50 |
0.00 |
-1.40 |
0.00 |
-1.13 |
0.01 |
107872419 |
probable
carboxylesterase 8 |
-1.95 |
0.00 |
-1.31 |
0.01 |
-2.50 |
0.00 |
107875683 |
CAF1; probable
CCR4-associated factor 1 homolog 9 |
-0.96 |
0.30 |
-1.72 |
0.02 |
-1.82 |
0.00 |
107841124 |
basic 7S
globulin-like |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
-3.36 |
0.04 |
107859803 |
acidic 27 kDa endochitinase |
-1.33 |
0.02 |
-1.14 |
0.07 |
-1.50 |
0.00 |
107859806 |
basic endochitinase-like |
-2.01 |
0.06 |
-1.72 |
0.17 |
-2.67 |
0.00 |
107856465 |
vicianin hydrolase-like |
-1.00 |
0.07 |
-1.15 |
0.04 |
-1.82 |
0.00 |
107860257 |
zingipain-2-like |
-1.67 |
0.02 |
-1.96 |
0.01 |
-2.59 |
0.00 |
107861184 |
zingipain-2-like |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
-3.20 |
0.03 |
107870929 |
serine
carboxypeptidase-like 19 |
-1.19 |
0.22 |
-0.97 |
0.45 |
-1.63 |
0.03 |
107867007 |
subtilisin-like
protease SBT1.2 |
-1.81 |
0.02 |
-0.64 |
0.73 |
-2.17 |
0.00 |
107840985 |
probable
beta-D-xylosidase 2 |
-2.20 |
0.00 |
-1.86 |
0.00 |
-2.23 |
0.00 |
107854898 |
glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase A-like |
-3.16 |
0.00 |
-2.75 |
0.02 |
-2.14 |
0.05 |
107879143 |
glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, basic |
-1.62 |
0.27 |
-1.51 |
0.38 |
-2.29 |
0.05 |
107840962 |
BG1;
beta-galactosidase-like |
-3.18 |
0.00 |
-2.09 |
0.00 |
-3.40 |
0.00 |
107861740 |
beta-galactosidase |
-2.12 |
0.00 |
-1.56 |
0.00 |
-1.80 |
0.00 |
107863277 |
pectin acetylesterase 9 |
-1.78 |
0.01 |
-1.33 |
0.15 |
-0.90 |
0.37 |
107859553 |
pectinesterase-like |
-2.07 |
0.00 |
-1.80 |
0.00 |
-2.20 |
0.00 |
107864477 |
ccel1;
endoglucanase 18-like |
2.85 |
0.04 |
2.46 |
0.13 |
3.02 |
0.02 |
107843046 |
DEAD-box
ATP-dependent RNA helicase 57 |
2.07 |
0.00 |
1.62 |
0.03 |
1.77 |
0.01 |
107862137 |
nudix hydrolase 18, mitochondrial-like |
1.51 |
0.00 |
1.02 |
0.13 |
1.37 |
0.01 |
107859272 |
xylem cysteine
proteinase 2-like |
1.66 |
0.03 |
1.60 |
0.05 |
0.88 |
0.43 |
107874054 |
probable
ribonuclease P/MRP protein subunit POP5 |
1.61 |
0.02 |
1.24 |
0.18 |
1.53 |
0.03 |
N/A: these genes are not
differentially expressed; LFC: log2 fold changes
Table 4: Genes identified in the metabolic carbohydrate
process category
Gene ID |
Name |
1 h |
3 h |
25 h |
|||
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
||
107869091 |
beta-amylase 3,
chloroplastic |
2.60 |
0.00 |
2.67 |
0.00 |
2.73 |
0.00 |
107862757 |
alpha-galactosidase-like |
-0.96 |
0.00 |
-0.79 |
0.04 |
-1.54 |
0.00 |
107859803 |
acidic 27 kDa endochitinase |
-1.33 |
0.02 |
-1.14 |
0.07 |
-1.50 |
0.00 |
107859806 |
basic endochitinase-like |
-2.01 |
0.06 |
-1.72 |
0.17 |
-2.67 |
0.00 |
107859802 |
CAChi2; acidic endochitinase pcht28 |
-2.03 |
0.00 |
-1.54 |
0.01 |
-1.09 |
0.10 |
107856465 |
vicianin hydrolase-like |
-1.00 |
0.07 |
-1.15 |
0.04 |
-1.82 |
0.00 |
107840985 |
probable
beta-D-xylosidase 2 |
-2.20 |
0.00 |
-1.86 |
0.00 |
-2.23 |
0.00 |
107854898 |
glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase A-like |
-3.16 |
0.00 |
-2.75 |
0.02 |
-2.14 |
0.05 |
107879143 |
glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, basic |
-1.62 |
0.27 |
-1.51 |
0.38 |
-2.29 |
0.05 |
107840962 |
BG1;
beta-galactosidase-like |
-3.18 |
0.00 |
-2.09 |
0.00 |
-3.40 |
0.00 |
107861740 |
beta-galactosidase |
-2.12 |
0.00 |
-1.56 |
0.00 |
-1.80 |
0.00 |
107864477 |
ccel1;
endoglucanase 18-like |
2.85 |
0.04 |
2.46 |
0.13 |
3.02 |
0.02 |
107859553 |
pectinesterase-like |
-2.07 |
0.00 |
-1.80 |
0.00 |
-2.20 |
0.00 |
107859925 |
GS; galactinol
synthase 2 |
2.60 |
0.00 |
2.22 |
0.02 |
2.02 |
0.03 |
107850683 |
inositol-3-phosphate
synthase |
2.64 |
0.00 |
1.95 |
0.00 |
1.96 |
0.00 |
107840943 |
inositol
oxygenase 4 |
-2.84 |
0.00 |
-3.70 |
0.00 |
-1.74 |
0.02 |
107867324 |
phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxykinase [ATP]-like |
-1.40 |
0.00 |
-1.45 |
0.00 |
-1.53 |
0.00 |
107878490 |
xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase
protein 15-like |
-0.60 |
0.72 |
-1.07 |
0.38 |
-1.72 |
0.02 |
107860149 |
probable xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein 7 |
-0.30 |
0.82 |
-0.52 |
0.60 |
-1.63 |
0.00 |
107847799 |
xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase
protein 31-like |
1.22 |
0.01 |
1.07 |
0.06 |
2.53 |
0.00 |
LFC: log2 fold changes
Table 5: Genes identified in the response to abiotic stimulus
category
Gene ID |
Name |
1 h |
3 h |
25 h |
|||
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
||
107862948 |
(6-4) DNA
photolyase |
1.56 |
0.00 |
1.66 |
0.00 |
1.42 |
0.00 |
107838759 |
adagio protein
3 |
1.43 |
0.00 |
1.76 |
0.00 |
1.49 |
0.00 |
107851542 |
stress enhanced
protein 2, chloroplastic |
2.74 |
0.00 |
2.89 |
0.00 |
2.57 |
0.00 |
107871194 |
ultraviolet-B
receptor UVR8 |
3.67 |
0.00 |
2.59 |
0.00 |
3.05 |
0.00 |
107873562 |
UV-B-induced
protein At3g17800, chloroplastic-like |
1.84 |
0.03 |
1.52 |
0.15 |
1.79 |
0.03 |
107842826 |
ultraviolet-B receptor UVR8-like |
1.61 |
0.00 |
-0.36 |
0.86 |
1.46 |
0.01 |
107863294 |
low-temperature-induced
65 kDa protein-like |
5.96 |
0.00 |
5.16 |
0.03 |
3.12 |
0.31 |
107860006 |
dehydrin
HIRD12-like |
1.89 |
0.06 |
2.08 |
0.03 |
0.71 |
0.71 |
107871210 |
dehydrin
HIRD11-like |
1.62 |
0.00 |
1.48 |
0.00 |
1.08 |
0.02 |
107858537 |
dehydrin Xero
1-like |
2.27 |
0.00 |
1.82 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.25 |
107866811 |
Dhn; phosphoprotein ECPP44-like |
1.54 |
0.00 |
1.50 |
0.00 |
0.80 |
0.01 |
107853534 |
mitogen-activated
protein kinase kinase kinase
ANP1-like |
5.39 |
0.01 |
4.56 |
0.07 |
5.97 |
0.00 |
107855817 |
B-box zinc
finger protein 32 |
3.41 |
0.28 |
5.52 |
0.02 |
2.25 |
0.59 |
107854515 |
protein
PHYTOCHROME KINASE SUBSTRATE 4 |
-0.55 |
0.29 |
-1.62 |
0.00 |
-0.27 |
0.73 |
107862854 |
MKK1;
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 9 |
-0.27 |
0.88 |
-1.88 |
0.01 |
-0.52 |
0.66 |
107863162 |
RNA polymerase sigma factor sigE,
chloroplastic/mitochondrial |
1.50 |
0.00 |
1.90 |
0.00 |
1.11 |
0.02 |
107848500 |
bidirectional
sugar transporter N3-like |
1.31 |
0.01 |
1.57 |
0.00 |
1.13 |
0.04 |
107875362 |
E3
ubiquitin-protein ligase CHIP |
1.10 |
0.01 |
1.52 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.05 |
LFC: log2 fold changes
Table 6: Genes identified in the biosynthetic process category
Gene ID |
Name |
1 hour |
3 hours |
25 hours |
|||
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
LFC |
FDR |
||
107848320 |
arogenate
dehydratase/prephenate dehydratase 6, chloroplastic-like |
0.63 |
0.51 |
1.69 |
0.00 |
0.35 |
0.79 |
107848097 |
agmatine
coumaroyltransferase-2-like |
1.57 |
0.26 |
2.36 |
0.03 |
1.09 |
0.54 |
107864266 |
chalcone
synthase 1B |
2.23 |
0.00 |
2.32 |
0.00 |
2.51 |
0.00 |
107871256 |
CHS; chalcone
synthase 2 |
2.11 |
0.00 |
2.32 |
0.00 |
3.01 |
0.00 |
107850996 |
chalcone
synthase J-like |
2.71 |
0.00 |
3.12 |
0.00 |
2.36 |
0.00 |
107855506 |
dihydroflavonol-4-reductase-like |
3.45 |
0.00 |
3.66 |
0.00 |
3.91 |
0.00 |
107868281 |
Psy; bifunctional 15-cis-phytoene synthase, chromoplastic |
1.63 |
0.02 |
2.22 |
0.00 |
0.94 |
0.35 |
107867263 |
UPA17;
growth-regulating factor 1-like |
1.00 |
0.08 |
1.57 |
0.00 |
1.13 |
0.03 |
107873461 |
phosphomethylpyrimidine
synthase, chloroplastic |
1.64 |
0.00 |
2.45 |
0.00 |
1.75 |
0.00 |
107847937 |
pyruvate
dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta-1, mitochondrial-like |
1.67 |
0.00 |
1.59 |
0.01 |
1.34 |
0.03 |
107877344 |
protein
STRICTOSIDINE SYNTHASE-LIKE 10-like |
-2.41 |
0.00 |
-1.66 |
0.00 |
-2.26 |
0.00 |
107875470 |
probable
pyridoxal 5'-phosphate synthase subunit PDX1 |
1.08 |
0.00 |
1.59 |
0.00 |
0.81 |
0.05 |
107859942 |
adenylosuccinate synthetase 2, chloroplastic |
-1.99 |
0.00 |
-1.65 |
0.00 |
-2.82 |
0.00 |
107841181 |
beta-amyrin
synthase-like |
-1.53 |
0.00 |
-1.85 |
0.00 |
-2.11 |
0.00 |
107850683 |
inositol-3-phosphate
synthase |
2.64 |
0.00 |
1.95 |
0.00 |
1.96 |
0.00 |
107864208 |
phosphate
transporter PHO1 |
1.72 |
0.00 |
1.51 |
0.01 |
1.53 |
0.01 |
107863162 |
RNA polymerase sigma factor sigE,
chloroplastic/mitochondrial |
1.50 |
0.00 |
1.90 |
0.00 |
1.11 |
0.02 |
107873218 |
probable
methionine--tRNA ligase |
-1.67 |
0.05 |
-1.98 |
0.02 |
-1.10 |
0.27 |
LFC: log2 fold changes
regulated genes, the
MAPK signaling pathway only was statistically significant (Fig. 6B). Moreover,
the enrichment of ten categories was observed at 25 h for up-regulated genes,
in which flavonoids biosynthesis and circadian rhythm-plant were significant
(Fig. 7A); in contrast, 10 categories were found for down-regulated genes, but
only sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis were statistically
significant (Fig. 7B).
Discussion
In this study, we analyzed the
gene expression profile in response to combined UV-B and cold at 1, 3 and 25 h
after stress exposure. The GO enrichment allowed to classify DEG into
categories related to hormones, ROS oxidation, pathogens, plasma membranes and
compound transport, cell wall and chloroplasts. We identified in response to
stress category, three cytochrome P450 genes were up-regulated under combined
stress at all times, which have been found associated to the regulation of
hormone biosynthesis such as abscisic acid. These results may suggest that
abscisic acid signaling leads to the maintenance of the photosynthetic
activity, antioxidant enzymes activation and osmoprotectant accumulation during
the combined stress of UV-B and cold (Peleg and Blumwald 2011). Moreover, we
found genes associated to regulate ROS oxidation, such as catalase and
peroxidase, which have been reported to be up-regulated in C. annuum subjected to cold showing protective activity (Ou et al. 2015). Interestingly,
down-regulated genes (107871378, 107872419, 107875683, 107841124, 107859803,
107859806, 107856465, 107860257 and 107861184) classified within hydrolase
activity were observed, they have been reported in response to pathogens, while
cold triggers a negative interaction pathogen-
Fig. 4: GO enrichment analysis of genes
differentially expressed at 1, 3 and 25 h in response to combined stress of
UV-B radiation and cold. The categories with a (*) are statistically
significant (α ≦ 0.05)
Fig. 5: Analysis of the differential
genes at 1 h by KEGG enrichment map. A)
Up-regulated genes, (B)
down-regulated genes. The x-axis indicates the enrichment factor, and the
y-axis shows the KEGG pathway. The colour of the dot
represents the adjusted P - value and
the size of the dot represents the number of genes
Fig. 6: Analysis of the differential genes at 3 h by KEGG enrichment
map. A)
Up-regulated genes B) down-regulated genes. The x-axis indicates the enrichment
factor, and the y-axis shows the KEGG pathway. The colour
of the dot represents the adjusted P -
value and the size of the dot represents the number of genes
Fig. 7: Analysis of the differential
genes at 25 h by KEGG enrichment map. A)
Up-regulated genes B) down-regulated
genes. The x-axis indicates the enrichment factor, and the y-axis shows the
KEGG pathway. The colour of the dot represents the
adjusted P - value and the size of
the dot represents the number of genes
defense pathways, and UV-B
radiation has been described to promote a positive interaction (Du et al. 2011; Fan et al. 2015), which may suggest that the combination of UV-B
radiation and cold significantly altered the signaling networks related to
pathogens, leading to the suppression of defense responses and increasing plant
stem susceptibility. In addition, six genes related to plasma membranes and transport of compounds were
found, where two ABC transporters were up-regulated, and involved in the transport
of phytohormones, heavy metals, lipids, chlorophyll catabolites, secondary
metabolites and xenobiotics (Nagy et al.
2009). Likewise, the up-expression of dynein light chain indicated activity
associated with the cell membrane, acting as kinesins that transport proteins
through the microtubules, from the membrane to the nucleus or vice versa (Li et al. 2018). These results indicate
that compound transporter genes alleviate the disruption of osmotic and ionic
homeostasis caused by UV-B and cold radiation. And up-regulation of
phospholipase D and lipid phosphate phosphatase genes were observed, the
phospholipase D is associated with the hydrolysis of membrane lipids and the
increase of phosphatidic acid (PA) content (Li et al. 2004), and lipid phosphate phosphatase gene transforms
substrates such as diacylglycerol pyrophosphate to PA and PA to diacylglycerol
(Pierrugues et al. 2001). The
increase in the expression of these genes at 1 and 3 h suggests high activity
in the signaling of UV-B radiation and cold.
Studies have
demonstrated that plants under various stresses (cold, drought, flooding and
radiation) generate changes in the turgor, expansion, flexibility and rigidity
of cell wall (Sasidharan et al.
2011). In this study, we detected ten down-regulated genes (107840985,
107854898, 107879143, 107840962, 107850683, 107840943, 107867324, 107878490,
107860149, 107847799), which participates in the modification and
reconstruction of the cell wall, using xylan, arabinoxylan, arabinose and
1,3-β-Glucan as a substrate (Oono et
al. 2006; Reboul et al. 2011). These findings indicate that the
development of the stems is largely modulated by genes identified in the
carbohydrate metabolic process, also it has been observed that the
down-regulation of these genes limits development in
pea (Lucau-Danila et al. 2012).
Finally, we identified genes related to protection of chloroplasts,
photoreceptor activity and flavonoid biosynthesis within response to abiotic
stimulus and biosynthetic process categories. We found one sigma factor gene
that was up-regulated, which regulates the transcription of chloroplast genes
for the core proteins of photosystem II (Hanaoka et al. 2012); and four dehydrins, that regulate the relative loss
of electrolytes, production of reactive oxygen species and chlorophyll content
(Zhang et al. 2020). Moreover, 5
genes with photoreceptor activity were up-regulated, such as one stress
enhanced gene that is early activated upon UV-B radiation exposure playing a
photoprotective role in the thylakoid membrane (Mackerness et al. 1999), adagio-3 gene related to a photoreceptor activity to
measure the duration of the day (photoperiod) (Imaizumi et al. 2003) and three UVR8 receptors, that control transcriptional
responses induced by UV-B radiation (Vandenbussche et al. 2014). These findings suggest that there is an early
perception of UV-B radiation at 3 h after combined stress exposure.
We examined the
biochemical metabolic pathways that were affected by differential genes by KEGG
enrichment analysis. Based on our results, we observed that most of
up-regulated genes grouped into the flavonoids biosynthesis and circadian
rhythm-plant at all sampling times. In C. annuum, an increased content
of flavonoids has been observed in response to the combination by UV-B radiation
and cold, maybe participating as antioxidant and UV-B absorbing compounds
(León-Chan et al. 2017). We found
that over time gene up-regulation was maintained in relation to products such
as pinocembrin chalcone, phloretin, naringenin chalcone, 7,4’-dihydroxyflavone,
apigenin and luteolin. While only in the 3 h treatment, genes related to
caffeoyl-CoA were present in the production of lignin and intermediate of
luteolin biosynthesis were up-regulated. At 25 h, up-expression of genes
related to metabolites such as galangin, fustin, kaempferol, quercetin and
myricetin were observed, which indicates that the synthesis of various
flavonoids could be crucial for the protection of the plant during the first 25
h of stress. Circadian rhythm-plant was also observed at all times, Duan et
al. (2014) reported that in rice
abiotic stress response pathways altered the circadian clock. Interestingly,
the 3 h treatment presented the over-expression of COP1 and FKF1, FKF1 works as
a photoperiodic receptor for blue light (Imaizumi et al. 2003), while COP1 imports UVR8 to the nucleus from the
cytosol (Yin et al. 2016), which is a
UV-B specific signaling component that binds to chromatin through histones and
regulates UV protection by organizing expression of a variety of genes (Rizzini
et al. 2011). On the other hand, the
inhibited genes FLS2, MKK9, CHIB and PYL were enriched the MAPK signaling
pathway at 3 h, where FLS2 participates in the stomatal closure, a mechanism
used to reduce bacterial entry into plant tissues (Mersmann et al.
2010). The MKK9 gene is related to cell death and delayed senescence in the
leaves in Arabidopsis (Zhou et al.
2009). The CHIB gene has been observed in leaves and stems of sweet pepper
after being infected with X. campestris
pv. vesicatoria and Phytophtora capsici (Hong et al.
2000). This suggests that at 3 h after treatment the pepper plants show greater
sensitivity to infection by pathogens.
Conclusion
We performed the transcriptomic
analysis of the combined effect of UV-B radiation and cold on stems of C. annuum L. after stress exposure at 1,
3 and 25 h. We identified the induction of genes related to abscisic acid biosynthesis at 1 h.
Furthermore, we can infer that after 3 h there is the greatest susceptibility
to pathogens. We also observed that in response to combined stress, genes
associated to flavonoid biosynthesis are induced at 1 h after treatment. These
data will be very useful genetic resource to analyze the resistance of peppers
to cold and UV-B radiation. Furthermore, further studies are needed to confirm
the roles of the candidate genes in the identified processes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by FOSEC
SEP-INVESTIGACIÓN BÁSICA, Proyecto No. A1-S-8466. Cátedras CONACYT:
Proyecto No. 784. Lightbourn Research. Convenio: 589683, Proyecto: Análisis
Transcripcional de Pimiento Morrón (Capsicum
annuum L.) bajo estrés abiótico. The authors thank Q.F.B. Jesús Héctor Carrillo Yáñez for
critical technical assistance.
Author Contributions
JLF, BH and LLR
conceived, designed and coordinated the study. BMM and RLC carried out the
experimentation. CV, JLF, APT, OCR and HMM analyzed the results. Contributed
reagents/materials/analysis tools: JLF, LLR and BH. CV and BH edited the
English grammar of the manuscript. All authors wrote, read and approved the
final manuscript.
All other authors
declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
Data presented in this
study are available on fair request to the corresponding author.
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
References
Airaki M, M Leterrier, R Mateos, R Valderrama, M Chaki, J Barroso, LD Río, J Palma, F Corpas (2011). Metabolism of reactive
oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants under low temperature stress. Plant Cell Environ 35:281‒295
Anders
S, W Huber (2010). Differential Expression for Sequence Count Data. Genom Biol 11:4310‒1415
Atkinson
N, P Urwin (2012). The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From
genes to the field. J Exp Bot 63:3523‒3543
Chugh
S, S Sharma, A Rustagi, P Kumari, A Agrawal, D Kumar
(2018). Enhancing cold tolerance in horticultural plants using in vitro approaches. In: Abiotic
Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective, 1st
Edition, pp:225-241. Springer, Singapore
Du H, Y Liang, K Pei, K Ma
(2011). UV radiation-responsive proteins in rice leaves: A proteomic analysis. Plant Cell Physiol 52:306‒316
Duan
M, P Huang, X Yuan, H Chen, J Huang, H Zhang (2014). CMYB1 Encoding a MYB
transcriptional activator is involved in abiotic stress and circadian rhythm in
rice. Sci World J 2014; Article
178038
Fan
S, L Jiang, J Wu, L Dong, Q Cheng, P Xu, S Zhang (2015). A novel
pathogenesis-related class 10 protein Gly m 4l, increases resistance upon Phytophthora sojae infection in soybean
(Glycine max [L.] Merr.). PLoS One 10; Article e0140364
Guo
WL, RG Chen, ZH Gong, YX Yin, SS Ahmed, YM He (2012). exogenous abscisic acid
increases antioxidant enzymes and related gene expression in pepper (Capsicum
Annuum) leaves subjected to chilling stress. Gene Mol Res 11:63‒80
Hanaoka
M, M Kato, M Anma, K Tanaka (2012). SIG1, a sigma factor for the chloroplast RNA
polymerase, differently associates with multiple DNA regions in the chloroplast
chromosomes in vivo. Intl J Mol Sci 13:12182‒12194
Hong
J, H Jung, Y Kim, B Hwang (2000). Pepper gene encoding a basic class II
chitinase is inducible by pathogen and ethephon. Plant Sci J 159:39‒49
Hou
X, H Zhang, S Liu, X Wang, Y Zhang, Y Meng, D Luo, R Chen (2020). The NAC
transcription factor CaNAC064 is a regulator of cold stress tolerance in
peppers. Plant Sci 291; Article
110346
Hwang
E, K Kim, S Park, M Jeong, M Byun, H Kwon (2005). Expression profiles of hot
pepper (capsicum annuum) genes under
cold stress conditions. J Biosci 30:657‒667
Imaizumi
T, H Tran, T Swartz, W Briggs, S Kay (2003). FKF1 is essential for
photoperiodic-specific light signalling in
Arabidopsis. Nature 426:302‒306
Koç
E, C Işlek, AS Üstün (2010). Effect of cold on protein, proline, phenolic
compounds and chlorophyll content of two pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Gazi Univ J Sci 23:1‒6
Lai
Y, B Xu, L He, M Lin, L Cao, S Mou, S He (2011). Differential gene expression
in pepper (Capsicum annuum) exposed
to UV-B. Ind J
Exp Biol 49:429‒437
León-Chan RG, LA Lightbourn-Rojas,
M López-Meyer, L Amarillas, J Basilio, TF Martínez-bastidas, C Villicaña, J
León-Félix (2020).
Differential gene expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes under low
temperature and ultraviolet-B radiation in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Intl J
Agric Biol 23:501‒508
León-Chan RG, M López-Meyer, T Osuna-Enciso, J
Sañudo-Barajas, J Heredia, J León-Félix (2017). Low temperature and ultraviolet-B radiation
affect chlorophyll content and induce the accumulation of UV-B-absorbing and
antioxidant compounds in bell pepper (Capsicum
anuum) plants. Environ Exp
Bot 139:143‒151
Li J,
D Yu, G Qanmber, L Lu, L Wang, L Zheng, Z Liu, H Wu, X Liu, Q Chen, F Li, Z
Yang (2018). GhKLCR1, a kinesin light chain-related gene, induces
drought-stress sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Sci Chin Life Sci 62:63‒75
Li W,
M Li, W Zhang, R Welti, X Wang (2004). The plasma membrane-bound phospholipase
Dδ enhances freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis
thaliana. Nat Biotechnol
22:427‒433
Love
MI, W Huber, S Anders (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion
for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:1‒21
Lucau-Danila A, C Toitot, E Goulas,
AS Blervacq, D Hot, N Bahrman, H Sellier, I Lejeune-Hénaut, B Delbreil (2012).
Transcriptome analysis in pea allows
to distinguish chilling and acclimation mechanisms. Plant Physiol Biochnol
58:236–244
Mackerness
SA, SL Surplus, P Blake, CF John, V Buchanan-Wollaston, BR Jordan, B Thomas
(1999). ultraviolet-b-induced stress and changes in gene expression in arabidopsis thaliana: role of signalling
pathways controlled by jasmonic acid, ethylene and reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Environ 22:1413‒1423
Mahdavian
K, M Ghorbanli, K Kalantari (2008). The effects of ultraviolet radiation on the
contents of chlorophyll, flavonoid, anthocyanin and proline in Capsicum annuum L. Turk J Bot 32:25‒33
Mercado J, M Reid, V Valpuesta, M Quesada (1997). Metabolic changes and
susceptibility to chilling stress in capsicum
annuum plants grown at suboptimal temperature. Funct Plant Biol 24:759‒767
Mersmann
S, G Bourdais, S Rietz, S Robatzek (2010). ethylene signaling regulates
accumulation of the fls2 receptor and is required for the oxidative burst
contributing to plant immunity. Plant Physiol 154:391‒400
Mittler
R, E Blumwald (2010). Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges
and perspectives. Annu Rev Plant Biol
61:443‒462
Nagy
R, H Grob, B Weder, P Green, M Klein, A Frelet-Barrand, J Schjoerring, C
Brearley, E Martinoia (2009). The Arabidopsis ATP-binding cassette
protein AtMRP5/AtABCC5 is a high affinity inositol hexakisphosphate transporter
involved in guard cell signaling and phytate storage. J Biol Chem 284:33614‒33622
Oono
Y, M Seki, M Satou, K Iida, K Akiyama, T Sakurai, M Fujita, K
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K Shinozaki (2006). Monitoring expression profiles of Arabidopsis
genes during cold acclimation and deacclimation using DNA microarrays. Funct Integr Genomics
6:212‒234
Ou L, G Wei, Z Zhang, X Dai, X Zou (2015). Effects of low temperature and
low irradiance on the physiological characteristics and related gene expression
of different pepper species. Photosynthetica
53:85‒94
Peleg
Z, E Blumwald (2011). Hormone balance and abiotic
stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr
Opin Plant Biol 14:290‒295
Pierrugues O, C Brutesco, J Oshiro, M
Gouy, Y Deveaux, GM Carman, P Thuriaux, M Kazmaier, (2001). Lipid phosphate
phosphatases in Arabidopsis regulation of the AtLPP1 rene in response to
stress. J Biol Chem 276:20300‒20308
Pressman
E, R Shaked, N Firon (2006). Exposing pepper plants to high day temperatures
prevents the adverse low night temperature symptoms. Physiol
Plantarum 126:618‒626
Reboul
R, C Geserick, M Pabst, B Frey, D Wittmann, U
Lütz-Meindl, R Léonard, R Tenhaken (2011). Down-regulation of UDP-glucuronic
acid biosynthesis leads to swollen plant cell walls and severe developmental
defects associated with changes in pectic polysaccharides. J Biol Chem 286:39982‒39992
Rizzini L, J Favory, C Cloix, D
Faggionato, A O'Hara, E Kaiserli, R Baumeister, E
Schafer, F Nagy, G Jenkins, R Ulm (2011). Perception of UV-B by the Arabidopsis
UVR8 protein. Science 332:103‒106
Rodríguez-Calzada T, M Qian, Å
Strid, S Neugart, M Schreiner, I Torres-Pacheco, R Guevara-González (2019). Effect of UV-B radiation
on morphology, phenolic compound production, gene expression, and subsequent
drought stress responses in chili pepper (Capsicum
annuum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem
134:94‒102
Sasidharan
R, L Voesenek, R Pierik (2011). Cell wall modifying proteins mediate plant
acclimatization to biotic and abiotic stresses. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:548‒562
Suzuki
N, R Rivero, V Shulaev, E Blumwald, R Mittler (2014). Abiotic and biotic stress
combinations. New Phytol 203:32‒43
Vandenbussche F, K Tilbrook, AC Fierro, K Marchal,
D Poelman, DVD Straeten, R
Ulm (2014). Photoreceptor-mediated bending towards UV-B in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant
7:1041‒1052
Yi S,
J Kim, Y Joung, S Lee, W Kim, S Yu, D Choi (2004). The pepper transcription
factor capf1 confers pathogen and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol
136:2862‒2874
Yin
R, M Skvortsova, S Loubéry, R Ulm (2016). COP1 is
required for UV-B–induced nuclear accumulation of the UVR8 photoreceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4415‒4422
Zhang
HF, SY Liu, JH Ma, XK Wang, SU Haq, YC Meng, YM Zhang, RG Chen (2020). CaDHN4,
a salt and cold stress-responsive dehydrin gene from pepper decreases abscisic
acid sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Intl J Mol Sci 2; Article 26
Zhou
C, Z Cai, Y Guo, S Gan (2009). An Arabidopsis
mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, mkk9-mpk6, plays a role in leaf
senescence. Plant Physiol 150:167‒177